ATI FireGL V5600 vs ATI FirePro V3750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (35.20GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
ATI FirePro V3750 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
200 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (48W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
FirePro V3750
+83%
0.352 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Sep 2008
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
89W
TDP
48W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
RV730
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
RV730 PRO
(215-0719056)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
