ATI FireGL V5600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (35.20GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (49W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 430 PCI
+40%
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Oct 2010
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
120
Shading Units
96
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
49W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GF108
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
GF108-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
