ATI FireGL V5600 vs NVIDIA T400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
264 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 89W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
T400
+469%
1.094 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
May 2021
FireGL
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
120
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
TU117
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
