Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V7600 vs NVIDIA A2

ATI FireGL V7600 vs NVIDIA A2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A2 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 127W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
A2 +1079%
4.531 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Nov 2021
FireGL
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
320
Shading Units
1280
16
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

127W
TDP
60W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GA107
R600 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
Unknown
420 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net