ATI FireGL V7600 vs AMD FireStream 9250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (127W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
+160%
1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jun 2008
FireGL
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
800
16
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
127W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
RV770
R600 GL
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
