Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

ATI FireGL V7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (31W vs 127W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600 +753%
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Nov 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
320
Shading Units
16
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

127W
TDP
31W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GT218
R600 GL
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy