Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V7600 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

ATI FireGL V7600 vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (18W vs 127W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600 +884%
0.384 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 2011
FireGL
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
16
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GT218
R600 GL
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

127W
TDP
18W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy