Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V7600 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

ATI FireGL V7600 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (127W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
3520 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +4540%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Jun 2021
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
3840
16
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Board Design

127W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Navi 21
R600 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy