Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V7600 vs AMD FirePro W600

ATI FireGL V7600 vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 127W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
FirePro W600 +100%
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
8
320
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Cape Verde
R600 GL
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

127W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy