Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

ATI FireGL V7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7700 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 72.06GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V7700
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +473%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jun 2020
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1126 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
72.06GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
896
16
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
TU106
RV670 GL
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy