ATI FireGL V8600 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI350X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI350X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (159W vs 1000W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI350X 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (8.19TB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
16064 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8600
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI350X
+16284%
72.09 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jan 2025
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
HBM3e
512bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
8.19TB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
256
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
16384
16
TMUs
1024
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2252.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
576.7 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
72.09 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
72.09 TFLOPS
Board Design
159W
TDP
1000W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
CDNA Next
R600 V8600
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
CDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
3 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
185 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
