Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8650 vs Intel Arc A770

ATI FireGL V8650 vs Intel Arc A770

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
Arc A770 +4368%
19.66 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Oct 2022
FireGL
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
DG2-512
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net