Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8650 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

ATI FireGL V8650 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650 +947%
0.44 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Jun 2007
FireGL
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
2
320
Shading Units
40
16
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
RV610
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy