Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8650 vs ATI FirePro V7800

ATI FireGL V8650 vs ATI FirePro V7800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
1120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
FirePro V7800 +358%
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Apr 2010
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
18
320
Shading Units
1440
16
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Cypress
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy