Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8650 vs AMD FirePro W4000

ATI FireGL V8650 vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000 +187%
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Aug 2012
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
12
320
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Pitcairn
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy