Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM

ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 140 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650 +111%
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 140 OEM
0.208 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Mar 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
64
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
208.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
G94B
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
105W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy