ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
80 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
+60%
0.708 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
512bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
320
Shading Units
240
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
204W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
GT200B
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
