Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs Intel Arc Pro A40

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs Intel Arc Pro A40

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Aug 2022
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
R500
Architecture
Generation 12.7
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy