Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 175W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Oct 2018
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
36
-
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
103.7 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
233.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.93 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
7.465 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
233.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-400A-A1
R500
Architecture
Turing
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
3.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy