Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 350W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Apr 2016
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
-
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
R500
Architecture
GCN 3.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
350W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy