Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Unknown
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
84
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
5376
4
TMUs
336
4
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
R500
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy