ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs Intel Arc A780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 200W)
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Rage 9
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.6
