Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 175W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Jul 2019
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
34
-
Compute Units
-
-
Shading Units
2176
4
TMUs
136
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
272
-
RT Cores
34
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
224.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.36 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
7.181 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
224.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV380
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-410-A1
Rage 9
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

9.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
-
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy