ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs Intel H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Nov 2020
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
DG1
-
-
-
Rage 9
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
130 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
Unknown
92 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.4
