ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI350X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI350X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 1000W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI350X 's Advantages
Released 17 years late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (8.19TB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
16384 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Jan 2025
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
288GB
DDR
Memory Type
HBM3e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
8.19TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
256
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
16384
4
TMUs
1024
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2252.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
576.7 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
72.09 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
72.09 TFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
1000W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
CDNA Next
-
-
-
Rage 9
Architecture
CDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
3 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
185 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
N/A
2.0
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
N/A
