Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2270 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

ATI FirePro 2270 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2270 PCIe x1 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2270 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1968 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2270 PCIe x1
0.096 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2 +4166%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
2048
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
96.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cedar
GPU Name
Tahiti
Cedar WS
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy