Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs Intel Arc A310

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 32W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Arc A310 +8300%
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
-
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
DG2-128
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy