Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +39368%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Sep 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
70
2
Compute Units
-
40
Shading Units
4480
4
TMUs
280
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GA100
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy