Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD FirePro S9170

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170 +16268%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jul 2015
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2816
4
TMUs
176
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Hawaii
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy