Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD FirePro W9000

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 +12381%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
274W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Tahiti
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy