Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
More VRAM (640GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
72 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 +740%
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
640MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
40
Shading Units
112
4
TMUs
28
4
ROPs
20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
80 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
G80
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy