Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
More VRAM (256GB vs 128GB)
24 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (9.600GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 +10%
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Aug 2008
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
40
Shading Units
16
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
G86
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy