ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 384MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 84W)
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 's Advantages
More VRAM (384GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (38.40GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
56 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GSO
+725%
0.264 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2008
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
384MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
12
40
Shading Units
96
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
264.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
84W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
G92
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
