Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 125W)
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
88 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand +1300%
0.448 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jul 2008
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
40
Shading Units
128
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.60 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
448.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

32W
TDP
125W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
G92
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
G92-270-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy