ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 120W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock1178MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
984 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 960
+7440%
2.413 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2015
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1127 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
112.2GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.70 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
75.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.413 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
75.39 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
120W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GM206
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
GM206-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
