Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4010 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4010 +8356%
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2024
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GA107
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy