Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega II +43931%
14.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2019
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
475W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Vega 20
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy