Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
600 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +5081%
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jul 2019
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
10
40
Shading Units
640
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Polaris 23
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy