Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon R7 340 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 340 OEM +1771%
0.599 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
599.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
37.44 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Oland
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy