Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280 +10350%
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Mar 2014
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
827 MHz
-
Boost Clock
933 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
28
40
Shading Units
1792
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Tahiti
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy