Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R9 390X

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R9 390X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 8GB VRAM Radeon R9 390X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 390X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 390X +18381%
5.914 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2816
4
TMUs
176
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
184.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.914 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
739.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Grenada
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
Grenada XT (215-0880004)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy