Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon RX 6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 53W)
AMD Radeon RX 6400 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2321MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6400 +11040%
3.565 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1923 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2321 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.27 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.130 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.565 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
222.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
53W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Navi 24
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL (215-135000046)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy