Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 335W)
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2310MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6950 XT +73806%
23.65 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2022
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1860 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2310 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
80
40
Shading Units
5120
4
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
295.7 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
739.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.31 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1478 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Navi 21
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 21 KXTX (215-121000289)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
335W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy