Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs ATI Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs ATI Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 512MB VRAM Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
40 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (32W vs 125W)
ATI Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (67.20GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2007
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1050 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
-
40
Shading Units
-
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.72 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
R580+
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
R580+ XT (215BAABKA31FG)
TeraScale
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.384 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
125W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VHDCI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1 (full) 3.0 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy