Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA T400

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA T400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 32W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
T400 +3318%
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
40
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
TU117
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy