Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX +34493%
11.07 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
10GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
40
Shading Units
3584
4
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
TU102
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy