Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
18136 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada +284462%
91.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Dec 2022
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
142
40
Shading Units
18176
4
TMUs
568
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
AD102
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
AD102
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy