ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1400 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
+6200%
2.016 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2010
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1440
4
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
Cypress
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
