Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 4GB VRAM Radeon R7 350X OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350X OEM +2418%
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2015
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Oland
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy