ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
600 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1050
+5718%
1.862 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Oct 2016
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1354 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
5
40
Shading Units
640
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.56 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.10 GFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.862 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
58.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GP107
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
GP107-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
